The Effect of Probing Prompting Model on Learning Outcomes of Plane Shapes Material In Grade III SDN Petok
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56480/eductum.v3i4.1343
Abstract View:
27
PDF downloads:
30
Keywords:
Probing prompting, ; Learning Outcomes, Planar ShapesAbstract
This study aims to determine whether or not there is a significant effect of the use of the probing prompting model on student learning outcomes in flat geometry material in class III SDN Petok, Mojo District, Kediri Regency. This study uses a quantitative method. The research design uses a pre-experimental design with a one group pretest posttest design. The population in this study were all third-grade students at SDN Petok in the 2023/2024 Academic Year. Sampling used a non-probability sampling technique, a saturated sampling type. The research sample was 19 students. Data were collected using observation and tests. The results showed that the magnitude of the effect was evident in the Wilcoxon test results obtained a significant value of 0.000. Based on the testing criteria, if the value of sig less than0.05 then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, which states that there is a difference in the pretest and posttest results. This means that there is a significant effect of the use of the probing prompting model on student learning outcomes in flat geometry material in class III SDN Petok.
References
Akbar, Sa’dun. 2017. “Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran”. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Anderson, L. W. dan D. R. Krathwohl. (2015). “Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom”. Terjemahan: Agung Prihantoro. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Arikunto, S. (2017). “Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian dan Penilaian Program”. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Arikunto, S. (2020). “Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik”. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Fauziah, dkk. (2017). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Primary. 9(2). Hal: 244-267.
Hanafiah. N., S. C. (2014). “Konsep strategi pembelajaran”. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Hendrawan, dkk. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar: Jurnal Kajian Penelitian dan Hasil Penelitian, 5(3), 24-33. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v5n3.p1084 1091.
Khasanah, dkk. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Cooperative Integrated Reading And Composition (CIRC) Terhadap Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Kelas V. Jurnal Pendidikan Modern, 5(2), 48-53.
Lestari, dkk. (2015). “Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika ”. Bandung: PT Rifeka Aditama.
M. Kusumawati and S. Hadi. (2018). An analysis of multiple choice questions (MCQs): Item and test statistics from mathematics assessments in senior high school Res. Eval. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 70–78,. N. Sa’idah, H. D. Yul
Magdalena, I., Fauziah, S. N., Faziah, S. N., & Nupus, F. S. (2021). Analisis Validitas, Reliabilitas, Tingkat Kesulitan dan Daya Beda Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Tema 7 Kelas III SDN Karet 1 Sepatan. Bintang : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sains, https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/bintang 3(2), 198–214.
Manoppo, R. dkk. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Segiempat. Jambura Journal of Mathematics Education. 3(2). 93-99.
Maswar, M. (2019). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Menyenangkan Siswa (MMS) Berbasis Metode Permainan Mathemagic, Teka-Teki dan Cerita Matematis. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika. 1(1), 28–43.
Montolalu, C., & Langi, Y. (2018). Pengaruh Pelatihan Dasar Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi bagi Guru-Guru dengan Uji-T Berpasangan (Paired Sample T-Test). D’cartesian, https://doi.org/10.35799/dc.7.1.2018.20113
Oktaviani, M. A. dkk. (2014). Perbandingan tingkat konsistensi normalitas distribusi metode kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors, shapirowilk, dan skewness-kurtosis. Jurnal Biometrika dan Kependudukan. 3(2), 127-135.
Permendikbud No. 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar. Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta
Ratnawulan, Elis & Rusdiana. (2015). “Evaluasi Pembelajaran”. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Riduwan, dkk. (2015). “Rumus dan dan Data dalam Analisis Statistika”. Bandung: Alfabeta,
Romadiyanti, B. (2021). “Konsep Dasar Evaluasi Program Penelitian : Inspirasi Kepenulisan dan Penelitian Widyaiswara”. Bogor: CV. Dandelion Publisher.
Shoimin, Aris. (2017). “68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Krikulum 2013”. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Siregar, S. (2020). “Statistik Parametik Untuk Penelitian Kuantitatif”. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara
Sudjana, N. (2017). “Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar-Mengajar”. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2016). “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D”. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019). “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung”: Alfabeta
Sukiyanto, dkk. (2021). “Matematika untuk PGSD/PGMI”. Yogyakarta: Nuta Media
Susanto, Hery., Rinaldi, Achi., N. (2017). Analisis Validitas Reliabilitas Tingkat Kesukuran dan Daya Beda pada Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semeseter Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Matematika. The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy, 37(3), 343.
Tobing, S. O. L. dkk. (2022). Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Kartu Huruf dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Siswa Kelas 1 pada Pembelajaran Tematik Tema 3 Subtema 2 di SDN Sampuran. Pedagogika: Jurnal Pedagogik dan Dinamika Pendidikan, 10(2). 191-198.
Tohir, Mohammad. (2016). Menjadikan Para Siswa Aktif Bertanya dalam Kelas Matematika Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya. 249–263.
Unaenah, dkk. (2020). “Teori Brunner Pada Konsep Bangun Datar Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial 2(2). 327–49.
Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, bab X pasal 37 ayat (1) Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta.
Utami, D. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting dalam Pembelajaran Mengabstraksi Teks Negoisasi Pada Siswa Kelas X SMA/MA, Jurnal Riksa Bahasa. 2(2). 151-158
Wirawan. F (2022). “Model-Model Pembelajaran untuk Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka”. Ponorogo: Bening Pustaka.
Wulandari, O.T. dkk. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Evaluasi dan Pembelajaran. 4(1). 1-7.
Yuliana, D., Ayu, O., & Putri, W. (2021). Pengaruh Penggunaan Digital Storytelling Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Mata Pelajaran Dasar Desain Grafis. Jurnal Informatika Dan Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.25008/jitp.v1i1.7
Zakky. (2018). “Pengertian Hasil Belajar Siswa dan Definisinya Menurut Para Ahli” Diunduh desember 2019 https://www.zonareferensi.com/pengertian-hasil-belajar/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizan Zakiyya , Nilamsari Damayanti Fajrin, Panji Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
