TECHNOLOGY-BASED EDUCATIONAL SUPERVISION MANAGEMENT TO ENHANCE LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56480/Keywords:
Educational supervision, Technology, Learning effectiveness, Teacher performance, Educational managementAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of technology-based educational supervision management and its contribution to enhancing learning effectiveness in secondary schools. The research employs a qualitative descriptive approach through a comprehensive review of relevant literature on educational supervision, digital technology integration, and instructional management. The findings indicate that technology-based supervision improves the efficiency of planning, monitoring, evaluation, and feedback processes. Digital platforms facilitate continuous communication between school leaders and teachers, enable real-time monitoring of instructional practices, and support data-driven decision-making for professional development. Furthermore, the integration of digital tools into supervision activities encourages teachers to adopt innovative teaching strategies, strengthens instructional quality, and promotes sustainable professional growth. The study concludes that technology-based educational supervision management plays a significant role in improving learning effectiveness by creating a more systematic, transparent, collaborative, and responsive supervision process. Successful implementation, however, depends on adequate technological infrastructure, digital competence among educators, and strong institutional support.
References
Alenezi, A. (2021). Digital leadership and educational supervision in the digital age.
Education Sciences, 11(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080416
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Handayani, L., Lebang, R., Sutono., Rikasari, F. E., & Warman. (2024). Critical review of technology-based education supervision models: Implications for improving the quality of learning in the digital age. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 31(1), 31–39.
Hastuti, R., Johar, P., & Taufani. (2025). Effectiveness of principals’ supervision and the learning performance of high school teachers through digital-based professional learning communities. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 9(1), 1–18.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2022). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M.
D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (5th ed., pp. 101–111). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36119-8
Mandinach, E. B., & Schildkamp, K. (2021). Data-based decision making for school improvement: Research insights and practice. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67648-3
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Irda Suriani, Anggi, Ahdia Riskon, Anggi Prasutio Marbun, Wahid Lubis, Rizki Purnawan, Rahma Dayani Hasibuan, Widia Permata Sari Siregar, Khomaria Harahap, Devita Sari Sipahutar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
